Main image
6th May
2009
posted by the Editor

A recent press release from the City of Fort Worth seems to imply that there is a pit bull — or “large aggressive dog” problem in the city.

Let’s be honest, folks: it’s not “large agressive dogs,” it’s the Pit Bulls are what we’re talking about. If there weren’t the pit bulls the large agressive dog problem in Fort Worth could be rounded up and kept in a couple of back yards. But Pit Bulls are everywhere. There are large numbers of these dogs at the humane society shelters, being put to sleep because there are far too many whelped.  But that’s only part of the problem. The rest of the problem — that people prefer to own aggressive dogs to intimidate their neighbors and don’t always keep them in the yard – is the larger deal.

Personally, I think an aggressive dog licence, costing more money and with a microchip, should be discussed. I’ve always been one who feels people’s rights, to be safe and not to be attacked, are more important than pet owners rights to own whatever kind of dog they want and let it run loose. At any rate, here’s the City’s press release:

Public Input Sought for Animal Ordinance Concepts

FORT WORTH – In 2008, city police officers were forced to use their weapons to subdue an aggressive animal 27 times.

Between 2006 and 2008, more than 3,300 reports of bites by an aggressive animal were reported.

Those are significant numbers and represent the significant potential risk to the public from stray aggressive animals.

Concepts recently presented by the city’s Code Compliance staff aim to be proactive in addressing the growing number of stray animals – particularly large, aggressive dogs – in the city.

New approaches could include:

  • adding an “aggressive dog” designation defining animal behavior that will trigger mandated enhanced safeguards, preventive measures and penalties
  • establishing minimum pen sizes for dogs
  • establishing variable fencing enclosure requirements based on the height and weight of animals, with required maintenance and self-locking gates
  • giving Animal Control officers authority to seize animals tethered or chained
  • requiring all dogs and/or cats to be spayed or neutered unless they have a valid intact-pet permit
  • requiring microchips for all pets unless a medical waiver is granted by a veterinarian
  • restricting relocation to Fort Worth of any “dangerous dogs” from other communities.

Changes to the fines and fees schedule could include:

  • making available a new three-year microchip pet license (with a three-year rabies vaccination)
  • making available a provisional license, offered by Animal Control field officers
  • making available a late license fee for unlicensed animals claimed at the Animal Care and Control Center
  • adding an annual intact-pet permit fee
  • adding an annual aggressive dog registration fee
  • increasing the cost of fines for dangerous dogs and unrestrained dogs.

As well, Animal Control is using a new, nonlethal net gun which, when fired, deploys a net that entangles aggressive loose animals, making them easier to capture, and is considering re-implementing the use of dart guns in extreme cases.

The public can offer input on the concepts during a series of open meetings:

6-9 p.m. Thursday, May 14 - Fort Worth Botanic Garden, Dorothea Leonhardt Lecture Hall, 3220 Botanic Garden Blvd.

6-9 p.m. Tuesday, May 19 - Travis Avenue Baptist Church, 3028 Lipscomb St.

6-9 p.m. Thursday, May 28 - Meadowbrook United Methodist Church, Community Life Center, 3900 Meadowbrook Drive

6-9 p.m. Thursday, June 4 - Goodwill Industries, Community Garden Room, 4005 Campus Drive

9 a.m.-noon Saturday, June 6 - Fort Worth Botanic Garden, Dorothea Leonhardt Lecture Hall, 3220 Botanic Garden Blvd.

 

 

 

 

   
Share

6 Comments

  1. Brandon Bennett
    06/05/2009

    I would like to personally invite citizens to participate in the public review process. Fort Worth has far too many strays, too many aggressive dogs attacking citizens and too many dogs that are living in unsanitary conditions without proper shelter, food and water. These meetings are all about collecting ideas and solutions, not about breed specific issues. If you cannot make it, send us your thoughts: codecares@fortworthgov.org.

    Thanks!

    Brandon Bennett
    Code Compliance Director

  2. Sonja
    07/05/2009

    Thanks for the comment. I hope lots of people, including those who own pit bulls and other large dogs and can share what they feel about the situation, will attend the meetings.

  3. [...] meetings discussing the large aggressive dog problem.  To see the original blog post, see “Fort Worth to Patrol for Pit Bulls? From a press release by the [...]

  4. 15/03/2010

    I, too, employ a pit-bull who is the most tender animal I’ve ever owned. Quickly, a new dog breed will occur along for that media to blast, as they have accomplished rotties and dobies in preceding many years. Unfortunate that media sensationalism breeds so much inaccurate information.

  5. Trisha
    05/01/2011

    Wow, Im sorry but this is twisted and sad. I beg you to please actually educate yourself before posting something like this, esp being an editor. You would learn that pitt bulls are not the common dog breed for dog bites or attacks in the city of ft worth or any city in dfw for that matter. You would also learn that Pitt bulls have a better temper than americas beloved golden retriever which is high on the list for dog attacks and bites than pitts in most cities. Also, the issue isnt the breed its bad owners and not getting your dogs fixed. Walking up to a fence and a dog barking at you because it doesnt know who you are or hwy you are there is natural! it doesnt mean its a danger! Hell if that’s the case then all the chihuahuas are in the same boat! And all little dogs for that matter! they! are more agressive but their attacks go unreported which is a shame bc more kids get attacked by them! Pitts are getting the same rap ask rotts and dobies! and akitas will be next!! PLEASE!! actually educate yourself before forming an opinion!! the news gets to choose what facts you do and dont get!! remember that!!

  6. the Editor
    05/01/2011

    Sorry you didn’t agree with the article, but I relied on statistics such as those located at http://www.dogsbite.org/pdf/dog-attack-deaths-maimings-2010.pdf

    For those who don’t want to crunch the numbers, I will reprint the author’s summariy:

    Any law strong enough and directed enough to prevent the majority of lifethreatening dog attacks must discriminate heavily against pit bulls, Rottweilers, wolf hybrids, and perhaps Akitas and chows …

Leave a Reply

Masthead image by Dallas Photoworks

Charter Cable

RECENT POSTS

16th January 2012
25th December 2011
20th December 2011
February 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829